A wise and dear colleague of mine, now retired, once said to me as we walked to class, “I teach for free; they pay me to grade.” I have found in my 22 years of teaching that I concur with his sage wisdom. I love my job! I love teaching! But…the tedium of grading exhausts me, especially in the typical mid-semester and end-of-semester timelines.
Despite
the fatigue it causes me, I understand that students can only learn something
if I correct them. Hattie’s (1987) meta-analysis of 87 studies—or any quick
google search—demonstrates the robustness of the literature that strongly
supports this hypothesis. With that in mind, I feel a strong sense of
responsibility to give students the best possible opportunity to learn from
their mistakes, an act that requires deep thought but clear and concise wording
on my part. However, it is the minimum of five to 10 minutes per paper of typing
in comments within the learning management system (LMS) for any/all
electronically submitted coursework that finds me lagging behind to complete my
grading.
Fortunately,
with the advent of ubiquitous technology and its continued improvement, I have
found a particular “hack” that allows for robust and effective feedback to my
students and minimal effort on my part. In short, while using any mobile device
or certain laptop computers, open the LMS and the box where you would normally
type your comments toward any student assignment. Then, push the button on your
tablet or phone for the talk to text and begin commenting. (I have presented
this concept at a variety of technology driven conferences and have been met
with astonishment and awe at the simplicity of this grading solution.)
You
will need to verbally speak the words “period” or “comma” to have grammatically
correct sentences for clarity to your students. This is a little odd to anyone
who can overhear you grading in your office, but it saves so much time that it
is definitely worth the risk of judgment. You can give the greatly detailed,
necessary feedback to your students (Ackerman 2010; Furnborogh 2009, Gibbs
& Simpson 2005; Hattie 1987) in a matter of seconds using this manner of
grading.
Additionally,
albeit similar to traditionally typed comments into an LMS, you will still need
to do a quick scan to make sure that there are no typographical errors.
Fortunately, many of these edits are easily and quickly fixed by another round
of talking to text.
I
do let my students know that this is how I complete the comments toward
assigning a grade on any assessment, just in case I miss the inadvertent
typographical error. With that in mind, some of my students take my admission
of my grading process as a suggestion; some students choose to write their
papers the same way. To laser-focus their thoughts and ideas as well as avoid
writer’s block, I strongly encourage them to do so.
It appears that the combination of focusing on critical thinking in the academic environment (Ennis 2011; Halpern 2013; Paul 1990), as well as building on 21st-century skills (Bell 2010) by using the talk to text functionality available to build and/or grade papers, seems like the best of what can be for both students and professors. (And, yes, I am currently writing this from my iPad in the Google Docs app.) I am invigorated by the act of teaching, enjoy learning new things, and embrace the ever-evolving relationship between pedagogy and technology. Moreover, I have always embraced Marc Antony’s adage of, “If you do what you love, you will never work a day in your life.”
With all of those elements put together and my iPad in my hand, unlike my friend Dan mentioned at the beginning of this article, I am not sure I will ever need to retire!
Vicki Ingalls is an Associate Professor of Mathematics at Tiffin University in Northwest Ohio. She enjoys both tech-ing and trek-ing (i.e. playing with technology and running/hiking/power-walking) with her husband and triplet teenage daughters.
References
Ackerman, David S., and
Barbara L. Gross. “Instructor feedback: How much do students really
want?.” Journal of Marketing
Education 32, no. 2 (2010): 172-181.
Bell, Stephanie.
“Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future.”
The Clearing House 83, no. 2 (2010):
39-43.
Ennis,
Robert. Critical Thinking. Inquiry:
Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26, no. 2, (2011): 5-19.
Furnborough, Concha, and
Mike Truman. “Adult beginner distance language learner perceptions and use
of assignment feedback.” Distance
Education 30, no. 3 (2009): 399-418.
Gibbs, Graham, and Claire
Simpson. “Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning.”
Learning and teaching in higher education
1 (2005): 3-31.
Halpern, Diane F. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to
critical thinking. Psychology Press, 2013.
Fraser, Barry J.
“Identifying the Salient Facets of a Model of Student Learning: A
Synthesis of Meta Analyses.” International
Journal of Educational Research 11, no. 2 (1987): 187-212.
Paul, Richard. Critical thinking. Rohnert Park, CA: Sonoma State University, 1990.
Talk to Text: A Hack on Grading
Stay Updated with
Faculty Focus!
Get exclusive access to programs, reports, podcast episodes, articles, and more!
TOPICS